Wednesday, October 26, 2011

SEEING THE FOREST THROUGH THE PALM TREES: MY ARTOBIOGRAPHY


Artists] remain the last best hope for a puncturing of ingrained biases, false consciousness, and wholesale cultural renewal. They are the cables, the deck, and pylons that constitute the bridge from recession to renaissance.
                                                                                -Christian Viveros-Fauné

Abandon the security of tradition.  Art doesn’t offer predictable messages, but it most powerful when it orchestrates perplexity, fails to confirm what you already know, and instead sends you away temporarily disoriented but newly attuned to experiences in ways that are perhaps even more powerful because they are vague, rogue, and indeterminate.
                                                                                             - Kirk Varnadoe


I have been interested in art as an observer and as a creator of drawings since childhood.  For as long as I can remember, art represented the telling of stories and stories, I sensed, led to a portrayal of and possibly an understanding of the human condition. 

I grew up in Tampa, Florida and was introduced to modern art by way of the Graphic Studio artists who worked at the University of South Florida.  Robert Mapplethorpe, James Rosenquist, Chuck Close, Los Carpinteros, and Robert Rauchenburg were among those who visited for sustained periods to produce graphic pieces.  Because my parents supported the program and collected the prints, the powerful images had a profound effect on me.  I saw them on our walls, I wondered about them, and I looked for stories.  Now I own one of them, a very large Victor Muniz, inspired by a film character in City of God.     

Note: Because Ybor City was an everyday part of life in Tampa, it is likely that along the way its colorful sights, sounds, and tastes served as subtle influences for my eventual connections with Cuba. 

Beginning in childhood I have drawn pictures of people and objects in the chapbooks I carry with me.  One chapbook consists of people on subways, another of Guatemalans at work.  Because drawing requires observational skills, I have understood that I am drawing someone or something, an “object” selected by me, but that my subjective perspective shapes, edits, and transforms the visual outcome.     

In college, where I majored in Latin American Studies and minored in Art and Art History, I began to appreciate formal aspects of art, but I wasn’t any better than my Stanford classmates when it came to explaining the meanings and techniques.   Along with fine arts courses required for my minor (collage, painting, drawing, and digital media), I took my first art history course.  I remember panicking in sophomore year when the Teacher’s Assistant turned to the class and asked us to say something critical about a slide projection of a Lee Krasner work.

It was a terrifying struggle to write about artwork for the first time instead of making it!  But when it came time to draft my first art history paper I found I liked it a lot more than any other subject I was taking. Also I recognized the value of editing!

During the summer of my freshman year I lived with my older brother in New York City and signed up for a survey art history course at New York University (1997). This fieldwork class provided a terrific art history experience!  We visited museums such as the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Guggenheim, MoMa, and the Frick. I remember standing in amazement as our professor explained the formal and historical significance of the Demoisselles D’Avignon. There was such a fascinating story hiding beneath the surface!  It was an introduction to context.

I really enjoyed the art history reading assignments that allowed greater familiarity with the broader formal trajectories in Western Art, from Peloponnesian to Picasso to Pollock. Reading assignments and the required papers fine-tuned my ability to verbalize visual information in a coherent, concise, and persuasive format.

Following the NYU summer experience of museums and gallery explorations, I returned to Stanford and took American Abstract Expressionism, a course that exposed me to an art movement that was uniquely American.  I learned about the impact of Mexican muralists like Siqueiros on American Abstract Expressionism. The cultural connections between Latin American and American artists encouraged me to consider connections between other artists in different geographical and cultural spaces.  My enthusiasm for art history increased during this incredible semester of pure modern Americana! 

I tried to make sense of these connections and contradictions in my researched papers and became aware that the theoretical frameworks, in turn, had begun to inspire my own artwork.  I was beginning to create artwork that was more socially relevant and personally meaningful. In a paper about Jackson Pollock I argued that his later work’s use of scale, gesture, and handprints implied that the painting was as much a record of the artist’s existence as a space to be gazed at.

Most of my free time in the art studios during my sophomore, junior, and senior year at Stanford was spent tackling concerns about space, composition, color, and scale. My interests and efforts resulted in the Nathan Oliviera Award for Painting by the Stanford Art Department when I graduated in 2000.

In addition to my work in the art department, my Honors’ Thesis for my Latin American and Caribbean Studies major focused on Cuban photographers.  Not unlike many of the artists I had come to know, the photographers similarly used their cameras to empower themselves with cultural agency. This area of study underscored once again the value and importance of the visual artist as a kind of storyteller.

These concerns about artistic agency and storytelling simmered on the middle burner after college when I moved to New York City and spent five years working in the fast-paced deadline-driven world of publishing (Gotham, Hamptons, Los Angeles Confidential Magazines, 2000-05). It was good to have a job and the experience enhanced my writing skills and expanded my knowledge about commerce, creativity, and the “real” world. 

In 2006, I was accepted by the Latin American Studies Department of New York University. I chose a Performance Studies focus and studied with Professor Diana Taylor, whose research pertains to new ideas and methods about art and performance in Latin America. For the Performance Studies focus, I took a course in Lima, Peru with the Yuyachkani indigenous theater group. The masks, cultural iconography, and new methods for engaging audiences that characterized this theatre group’s repertoire broadened my notions about artistic agency and meaningful cultural contributions. These parallel notions have contributed to my on-going interest in writing about Cuban artwork, artists and the vital stories they tell.

In 2007 a Tinker Fellowship (2007) research grant allowed me to travel to Cuba once again to investigate artistic agency and expression. There, I saw first-hand how a handful of Cuban visual artists were illustrating the story of Cuban history as it unfolded around them with vibrant and imaginative artwork that was much more enthralling—and somehow more true—than the accounts presented by news media and shrewd economic analysis. Moreover, their expressions were set in the midst of an economic catastrophe.

The Cuba window closed abruptly when worsening US-Cuba diplomatic relations led to tightened travel restrictions.  Although I felt detoured from my imagined destiny, the deviation was temporary.  I became a Peace Corps Volunteer (2008-10) in Guatemala, an experience that made the most of the cumulative three years of time I would have had to spend waiting in limbo for policy relaxation by the soon-to-be President Obama. I was accepted right out of NYU grad school and assigned to a village set in the shadow of a large, inactive volcano on the slopes of which coffee was grown.  I helped to market the coffee produced by my community to foreign buyers by using the writing, video editing, publicity, and marketing skills that I had accumulated during my professional experiences in New York City.

Peace Corps experience may seem about as far removed from the sphere of art history as the moon, but it turned to be just the other way around.  Peace Corps service experiences reminded me once again that stories matter; they are at the heart of all cultural and social agency. I realized that stories were as vital for all societies as food, clothing, and shelter are for all individuals.  While living near my Guatemalan volcano, I appreciated how artists were the record keepers, the storytellers.  Their stories provided them with the power of cultural agency.

The Cuban Art Space of the Center for Cuban Studies hired me straight out of Peace Corps service.  All of the past experiences I have been presenting in this statement —Stanford University, NYU, The Peace Corps, etc.—have converged like a fairy tale with a happy ending to produce Act III in the Life of Alexander Nixon, M.A!

The Center for Cuban Studies exemplifies the notion that artists can bridge the misunderstandings between countries. We build bridges by sending educational groups to Cuba to meet Cuban artists, learn about their art, and expect that on their return home, they will share their experiences with fellow US Citizens. The Center has provided me with access to Cuban art and arts that I had never imagined. My responsibilities center on Cuban art and artists, so as to stimulate public curiosity, excitement, and support.

Often I write stories about Cuban art for on-line publication (CUBAUpdate and ARTSlant). In the articles I try to contextualize the cultural contributions by Cuban artists, whose work we exhibit, photograph, archive, and sell.  I also translate interviews and articles by other writers, edit and translate, sub title videos, write press releases, and blog about Cuban art.  On occasion I paint colorful acrylic titles on the wall for each of the continuous stream of exhibitions at the Center.  My news articles focus frequently on Cuba’s recent cultural recession-to-renaissance during which a new generation of Cuban artists have came of age and contributed to the visual chapter of Cuban history.  

That's it! (for now)

-- Alexander Nixon, M.A.





Monday, April 25, 2011

Within the Revolution, Everyone

By Alexander Nixon, MA

A naked woman covered in white make-up crouches on the floor after having hacked off her own head with a samurai sword. This powerful image by Cuban painter Rocío García, whose three-part interview for the Cuban Art Space Interview Series is a tour de force of philosophy, existentialism, and nihilism that makes Nietzsche and Freud seem quaint.

"From our attitudes about sexuality spring forth many of our social, economic, even political problems," she explains in the interview.

“All of our human relationships are bound by love and violence,” she states later on.

As a viewer, I interpret the auto-decapitation painting from her Geisha series as her way of illustrating how individuals many societies may resort to self-inflicted violence and sexual self-repression in order to conform to the status quo.

Ms. García's Geisha series specifically addresses the oppression of women in society. She explains that the white make-up she uses to cover her female Geishas is a kind of mask behind which women hide their desires, conflicts, and opinions.



I would argue that there is yet another layer of significance here to peel away. Is a blank canvas covered in paint not as much a kind of mask as a painted body/face?

Interpreted in this way, we can say that Ms. García's paintings are like little mini-Revolutions that are intended to give the viewer the opportunity to liberate him or herself from self-repression.

Cuba, with its lofty Utopian aspirations, has provided unique challenges for the reconciliation of individual desires and sexual attitudes with the utilitarian goals of the state.

Not unlike other modern societies the Cuban Revolutionary government had a difficult time dealing with and assimilating gay culture into the social model. Cuba characteristically has been an open society about sex, but very closed when confronted with same sex relationships.  



I was first introduced to the subject of sexual politics in Cuba when my college Spanish course included the 1979 film Fresa y Chocolate.  The film story concerns two young men, one who is a gay artist and the other, a spy assigned to befriend the artist and report alleged anti-Revolutionary activities.  The film portrays the psychological toll of Cuba's absolutist revolutionary creed on a gay artist who doesn't fit the masculine, heroic revolutionary stereotype as exemplified by Castro.



"Within the Revolution: Everything. Outside of it: Nothing," Castro once declared on June 30th, 1961, just two years after the triumph of the Cuban Revolution.



This philosophy may work very well when it comes to government hierarchies and economic supply chains, but not when it comes to complex human relationships and desires. 

Castro wanted a new "revolutionary consciousness" to penetrate every aspect of society, without exceptions. To him, the Revolution was not a pair of camouflage pants that was put on for battle, and taken off at home.  Skin itself must be stained camouflage and everywhere was regarded as a battlefield.

Such absolutism obliterates the distinction between the personal and the political. Obviously, these are untenable expectations. 

An example of unrealistic expectations is presented by the police officer avatar who appears in several of García's paintings.




In the interview she explains that although the police officer represents order and authority, he remains, essentially, a human being.  He or she feels the frustrations, anxieties, desires, and contradictory impulses common to all humans. Even though the officer is equipped with a gun and handcuffs, the figure is helpless when it comes controlling personal characteristics and desires.

The interview with Rocío García about her visual record of past suppressions and injustices, including those revealed in Fresa y Chocolate, underscores that change has occurred. The Cuban government's attitude toward gays has improved since the days of Fresa y Chocolate. Today, the Cuban government is more tolerant of gay lifestyles and those who celebrate them. The visual commentary by Rocío García can be regarded as a contributing for those changes. 

Castro himself apologized for the Cuban government’s treatment of gays during the early days of the Revolution. “If someone is responsible, it is I,” he said, according to the BBC. Castro added that he was too occupied with the attacks against him and his government to confront to homophobic attitudes within his regime during the early years of the Cuban Revolution.

That García’s meteoric rise to international stardom is fully supported by the Cuban government serves as a further illustration of the government’s move away from absolutism toward inclusiveness.

Currently, García is a Professor of Art at the San Alejandro School of Art in Havana. She received a scholarship from the Cuban government to study seven years in Leningrad, where she received a Master of Fine Arts in 1983 at the Repin School of Art and in 2005 she was awarded the Distinction for National Culture accorded by the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Cuba.

Her paintings are battlefields onto which the viewer projects his or her own personal liberation from a social context that subordinates individual desires to that of the collective, utilitarian good. 

This may explain the international appeal of her work.  Every society by definition tries to repress the individual, even the most advanced ones.  Garcia’s paintings are deeper and more primal than and many artists dare to go.



•••
I was editing this article at the Center for Cuban Studies/The Cuban Art Space here in Chelsea, New York City when Rocío García herself rang the bell and walked through the door.



She is in town for an exhibition of her work at the Mishkin Gallery of Baruch College and wanted to see the Pasatiempos exhibit at the Center for Cuban Studies/The Cuban Art Space where she has exhibited her work in the past and has many pieces for sale.

I chatted with her for a little while and she taught me a Cubanismo expression that I had never heard before: El ojo del amo engorda el caballo (“The eye of the master makes the horse fatter”).

That is to say, if you value what you have, what you have gains value.   

Me with Cuban Artist Rocío García at The Cuban Art Space.
I thought this aphorism resonated perfectly with what I had been trying to convey in this article about why Rocío García’s work is so wonderful and important: When a society celebrates the diversity of its members (sexual, or otherwise), we all prosper. However, when people are forced into secrecy and they hide their lifestyles from society, we all suffer.

Please be sure to check out Rocío García’s work at the Mishkin Gallery in New York City in late-April/early May as part of the Sí, Cuba festival, and watch the 2-part interview with her by Sandra Levinson and video-grapher Jenny Hellman that I translated and subtitled.



-----------------------------------
-----------------------------------
-----------------------------------
-----------------
Alexander Nixon is the Organizational Development Coordinator at the Center for Cuban Studies/The Cuban Art Space. Rocío García will be at the Mishkin Gallery of Baruch College on April 28th, 2011 to discuss her work.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

A New Horizon: The Cuban Art Space Interview Series with Marlys Fuego

By Alexander Nixon, MA


The interview with twenty-two year-old Cuban artists Marlys Fuego is much shorter than the others from the Cuban Art Space Interview Series, but in few words gives us an interesting glimpse.

Marlys Fuego doesn’t convey the sense of struggle and determination that defines many of the other Cuban artists who were interviewed for the Interview Series (e.g. Rocío García, Sandra Ceballos).



Her older colleagues had direct experience during two tumultuous decades of economic disaster. The lives of this older group were marked by crisis, and the art they created was both a response to and a refuge from those difficult times.

Younger artists like Marlys Fuego came of age at the tail end of Cuba's “Special Period” of economic crisis, which began in the 90s after the Soviet Union's collapse. She and other artist colleagues are taking full advantage of the new possibilities afforded by Cuba's flourishing art scene.

These young artists look beyond Cuba for inspiration, and now that the US is offering to travel opportunities Cubans, artists are among those most sought after for travel to the US and Europe.

Ms. Fuego’s work combines erotic forms with whimsical colors and fabrics. The result is quirky and coy. When interviewed, Ms. Fuego described her fascination with the life and work of French-American sculptor Louise Bourgeois, the pop art technique of Andy Warhol, and her admiration for Charlie Chaplin.  These are not the kinds of icons normally associated with the Cuban trinity of Che, Fidel, and José Martí!

Havana is the metropolis of Cuba art and draws talented young artists like Marlys from far-flung provinces (Las Tunas, in her case) who hope to find artistic recognition in the capital and beyond while working with like-minded artists. 

The creative collaboration between Marlys Fuego and Cuban artist William Pérez (with whom she moved to Havana from Cienfuegos) exemplify this trend in Cuba, but with a romantic twist: they have become artist couple/collaborators.



(Note that Mr. Pérez is another artist from the Cuban Art Space interview series).

We will want to follow these two and so many other talented artists on collaborative journeys into the future...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander Nixon is the Organizational Development Coordinator for the Center for Cuban Studies. He has a BA from Stanford University in Latin American Studies and an MA from NYU in Latin American and Caribbean Studies.

Marlys Fuego González was born in Las Tunas in 1988. She lives and works in Havana, Cuba. She will be showing her new works in September 2011 at The Center for Cuban Studies/The Cuban Art Space.


Tuesday, March 29, 2011

BOOK REVIEW: A Castle Under Siege: Voices from the Other Side, An Oral History of Terrorism Against Cuba

By Alexander Nixon, MA

Beyond the importance of telling a story that is mostly unknown in the United States but certainly needs telling, Keith Bolender's Voices from the Other Side: An Oral History of Terrorism Against Cuba, offers a refreshing counter-narrative for the Miami-driven discourse about Cuba being an island of oppression. According to Bolender's central thesis, the very same people who criticize the oppression of the Cuban government are, in fact, responsible for it. 



In Voices Bolender cites the following quote by St. Ingatius Loyola: “in a besieged castle, all dissent is treason” (p. 17). As a New Yorker, who lived through the September 11th attacks, this quote describes the irrational hysteria occurring in the wake of that cataclysmic day.  Since that terrible time, even the most progressive people among us accept the random backpack searches in the MTA by police or the unsolicited pat-downs at airports.  Most agree that some freedom can be sacrificed for security.  


According to testimonials recorded by Bolender, after 1959 and the events that followed,  Cubans similarly, have sacrificed liberty for security.  An interview with Emilio Comas, for example, argues that the problematic relationship between security and freedom explains precisely the absence of opposition parties in Cuba.



"Once the terrorism and the blockade [U.S. Embargo] ends, then we can breathe and find out what we want from our society. Americans and the dissidents confuse the concepts of liberty and concepts of democracy regarding human rights. What government would allow a demonstration that has been supported by a foreign government, one that publicy says it wants to overthrow our system? Would the United States allow an opposition movement inside the US that was financed and supported by Al Qaeda?" (pp. 205-6). 



Some might ask if the successive post-1959 acts of terrorism against Cuba by CIA-trained Miami exile groups might be regarded as comparable to Al Qaeda acts of terrorism on the United States.  The firsthand testimonials about the ominous threats of terror from the neighbor to the North suggest that Cubans, indeed, were and have remained fearful of terrorist attacks.



Mr. Bolender provides many accounts about CIA-trained Cuban exiles who injured or killed hundreds of Cubans over the fifty years following the Revolution.  His Cuban interviewees, none of whom were associated or connected with the government, discuss bombings, biological attacks, sabotage of a Cubana airline, and psychological warfare.  According to these accounts, all of the attacks are traced back to the CIA's Operation Mongoose and to exile groups such as Alpha 66.  In addition, the testimonials support claims of terrorist acts organized  by Luis Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch against ordinary Cubans because of citizen submission to communist rule. 



Noam Chomsky notes in his Introduction to Bolender’s book that the siege of the Cuban castle had begun long before Castro’s Cuban Revolution.  Beginning with the Spanish-American War, US foreign policy is as much to blame for Cuba's "siege mentality" as are the CIA-trained exile groups,. In effect, the Monroe Doctrine opened the door for US imperialistic designs that would culminate in the Spanish-American War of 1898.  

From that point on, Cuba's sovereignty and independence depended  on US hegemony.  Cuba might have gained independence from Spain but under the Platt Amendment in 1901, that independence was translated into  US- protectorate status. Since then, Cuban sovereignty and national self-determination have been subjected to US foreign policy and our economic interests.



This lopsided relationship was exacerbated by the Cold War and the prevailing Domino Theory about political stabilization in the western hemisphere. According to Bolender, Kissinger and other policy-makers did not want Cuba's revolution to be an example for Latin American countries  to follow.



Therefore, after inheriting Eisenhower's enmity for Cuba's defiance of US hegemony, Kennedy made ousting Castro central to his policy towards Cuba. Consequently, the CIA trained and funded Cuban exile groups that continued their terrorism long after the US government's zeal for killing Cuba gave way to lassitude. 

As Voices demonstrates, this reign of terror continued well into the 90s. 

Bolender argues that the "castle under seige" notion by the US since 1901 and  after 1959  serves to explain the lack of transparency and lack of opposition parties’ criticism leveled by Miami exile groups in their unending statements of condemnation. 

"The resultant siege mentality and unconditional demand for patria (unity) has driven the government into implementing security policies that have curtailed certain civil rights, nurtured and individual culture of suspicion complete with a language of political code, and has cultuvated a sense of fatalism and black humor that marks much of the modern [Cuba] identity" (p. 203).

Recently, Mr. Bolender visited the Center for Cuban Studies to discuss his book with author Michael Smith and Sandra Levinson, the Center’s Director. Note that video from the discussion can be seen below. 



Much of their discussion revolved around the sabotage of the Cubana airline flight, the acts of terrorism directed against civilian targets, and the Cuban Five.  Because few Americans are familiar with the acts of terrorism described by Bolender and his interviewed Cubans, Voices from the Other Side: An Oral History of Terrorism Against Cuba provides an important and valuable record.

It also illuminates the effects of violence on a country's sense of psychological security and how, when a country is threatened, the relationship between freedom and security becomes distorted. On this point, I doubt few Americans who were around during and after September 11th would disagree.
__________________________________________________________________________________

Alexander Nixon is the Organization Development Coordinator for the Center for Cuban Studies / Cuban Art Space. He has a BA from Stanford University in Latin American Studies and Fine Arts and an MA from NYU in Latin American Studies.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Still Trading Punches

By Alexander Nixon
In a few days the Art of Mella show at the Center for Cuban Studies comes down. My favorite painting from the exhibition is the one by the famous painter El Estudiante (The Student) called US-Cuba that depicts a Cuban and an American boxer in caricatured forms in front of an anxious crowd.

It is a perfect metaphor for US-Cuba relations.

The Cuban Revolution began like a boxing match between the United States and Cuba. But even though the bell rang a long time ago, we are still trading punches.

It started after Fidel’s triumphant march into Havana with his army of guerillas in 1959 when the task of governing cast light on the inequities inherent to the system of land and property ownership in Cuba.

Fidel burst out of his corner by enacting land reform and seizing property owned by US sugar companies. POW!

Then the Eisenhower Administration retaliated by refusing to process crude oil in Cuba from the Soviet Union at refineries owned by the United States. WHAM!

But Castro responded with an uppercut and nationalized all U.S. properties. WHOOMP!

Then the United States pounded Cuba with an economic embargo. The crowd wonders, is it a TKO??? Nope. Not by a long shot. Even today, during the Obama Administration, we're trading punches with Cuba. USAID worker Alan Gross was recently arrested for bringing  electronic equipment to Cuba in violation of Cuban law.

He got caught, and now the US expects the Cuban government to release him. If they don't, the US will retaliate by not easing travel restrictions for Americans. At least, that appears to be the case as of this March, 2011.

Nearly two months after the announcement by the Obama Administration that travel restrictions were being eased, the Treasury Department still has not followed through. Meanwhile, we Cuba travelers are anxious for the fight to finish.

Of course, the tragedy of this boxing match caricature is that, with the Cold War over and everything, Cuba and the United States don’t have anything to fight about. The generation that lost all their stuff is gone and the new generation is ready to let bygones be bygones.

Hang up your gloves fellas. The fight is over! Fellas? POW! WHOOMP!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander Nixon is the Organizational Development Coordinator of the Center for Cuban Studies/The Cuban Art Space in New York City.

Live recording of El Cimarrón from CBGBs, New York City in 2005.


CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

Castro’s Cuba

By Alexander Nixon
The entire world is familiar with the photograph of Fidel Castro as the guerilla warrior in military fatigues. What was to become his iconographic and never-changing image was established at the inception of the cataclysmic Cuban social experiment when Lee Lockwood’s lens captured the sweating rebel leader in signature fatigues while overseeing his soldiers, greeting his public, and wielding a machete during the annual sugar cane harvest (zafra) in the 1960s. Then and now, this same guerilla warrior image suggests an on-going war in defense of his Cuban socialist revolution.

Although vaguely familiar with the image, I began to reflect on it more intensely as a topic for study while an undergraduate at Stanford. I wrote a paper about Lee Lockwood’s famous photographs of Castro snapped when he was fighting against Batista in the Sierra Maestra Mountains of Eastern Cuba --Lockwood died in 2010. Castro, who was savvy about the power of the press, did not miss an opportunity for forging positive public opinion!

Recently I began working at the Center for Cuban Studies in New York City and was surprised to learn that Lee Lockwood was the Center’s founder.

At the Center I find myself surrounded by the same early, and still mesmerizing, photographs of the young freedom fighter taken by Lockwood. Now framed and behind glass, they seem like time capsules, small windows into the past. Those and the photo portraits collected in Lockwood’s book, Castro’s Cuba, Cuba’s Fidel inspire thoughts about how much public opinion of Castro has changed--and how little Fidel Castro himself has changed.

My own attitude about Castro has shifted as well--from early fascination to ambivalence. He was, I recall, uncompromising in his defense of the Revolution: “Within the Revolution everything, outside of it, nothing.” That pure and selfless battle cry now seems naïve and dated in the aftermath of the fall of the Soviet Union. At the Center for Cuban Studies I have opportunities to engage Cuban artists and thinkers who share my evolved opinion and my ambivalence. They are proud of the revolution, but confess to feelings of exhaustion!

What, we wonder, will happen to the now tedious image of Castro when relations are normalized between the U.S. and Cuba? As the current wildfire of revolution spreads across the Middle East and anachronistic dictatorships fall, visitors to the Center frequently wonder out loud if Cuba will have the same experiences.

Probably not. Ironically, the long standing U.S. Embargo serves as a nationalistic rallying cry that keeps Cubans unified and wary of the United States.

We know, of course, that Castro will die and that changes are inevitable. As I think about that future event and read about the dirty financial and personal secrets of ousted strongmen like Mubarak, I wonder if any skeletons are stored in Castro’s closet and whether or not my ambivalence towards Castro will ever be allayed?

A few years ago Forbes Magazine declared that Fidel Castro is worth $900 million, a claim based on the fact that, as the former head of the Cuban government, he has the entire wealth of Cuba to spend at his discretion.

In response to the article by Forbes, Fidel Castro took the position of consummate revolutionary, saying that he has sacrificed normal family life for the sake of preserving the Cuban socialist system. According to him, his net worth is zero and that he earns a salary of 900 Cuban pesos a month. "If they can prove that I have a bank account abroad, with $900 million, with $1 million, $500,000, $100,000 or $1 in it, I will resign," he declared in a television appearance.

If Castro has money, unlike other leaders in the news, he doesn’t flaunt it. His garb remains the same and, compared to Khadhafi’s ostentatious ensemble, he is locked into a dated look. When the Cuban government enacted sweeping land reform, thereby infuriating former citizens living in the U.S., Castro’s family’s estates were among those confiscated. Because Castro is so secretive about his personal life, it is hard to make any determination about his wealth. We do not know if a treasure trove will be found after his death.

We remain uncertain about this historic figure. If it were to be revealed that he has money, mansions, and mistresses hidden away, he knows that his reputation and all that he has achieved as a revolutionary will be tainted and re-evaluated accordingly. I think it’s more likely to be the case that, when Castro dies, there will be no surprise revelations about his financial worth. Instead, we will discover that, all along, he was steadfast in his fight to defend Cuban dignity and sovereignty.

Given Castro’s well-documented obsession with Cuban history and his emulation of Cuban martyrs such as José Martí, I suspect that Castro is much more interested in preserving his socio-political currency than any hard currency. It’s not the money, Lebowski. It’s the power, the power to preserve the Cuban socialist system.

In the end, Castro’s iconic stature may strengthen after he dies when Cuba joins the rest of the world. At that point, his enemies in the United States who were so quick to criticize him for profiting off the poor Cuban people will swoop in like carpet-baggers in search of financial gain.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander Nixon is the Organizational Development Coordinator of the Center for Cuban Studies/Cuban Art Space in New York City.